This was my letter to the editor Deccan Herald on 4May which was published subsequently on 5May 2012 morning in Bangalore edition .
letters@deccanherald.co.in
Sir,
This
is regarding the injunction by the veteran writer and columnist
Kuldip Nayer- "Don't stifle the media" which
appeared in Deccan Herald today.
I
have great respect for Kuldip Nayar as the champion of freedom of
Press but I was surprised to find him joining issue over the matter
with the Supreme Court .What is the harm if the Hon'ble Supreme
Court, in genuine interest, thought it fit to endeavor for the first
time to lay down guidelines for the Press and media ? If the
Founding fathers of the Indian Constitution could lay down
guidelines for all successive Governments in the Indian democracy to
pursue and follow the Directive Principles of State Policy in its
governance then why should not the Supreme Court or the Indian
Parliament can frame certain cardinal principles which should be
practiced and followed by the Press ?. Many times we find that the
television media and media as a whole have exceeded its limits of
freedom of Press in highlighting a story completely based on their
conjecture to sensationalize an issue in which a particular group of
politicians, corporate group or a particular person is interested
.In India media is owned by corporate groups and persons and they
have their own policies and agendas and political leanings . It is
therefore necessary that the Press should be open to healthy and
constructive criticism in exercise of its right of freedom of
expression or freedom of Press .
After
all it is the Press in the last resort where ordinary citizen prefers
to seek justice against the excesses of executive or poor
performance by the legislature or miscarriage of justice by
judiciary, but if the citizen finds that his "last resort"
has also become corrupt with prejudices then the future of democracy
is certainly in danger and freedom expression is in peril.
Regards,
GP
Bahuguna